The Living Inquiry

Conversations inside an unfolding inquiry

The Living Inquiry isn't where questions become answers.

It's where they're given time to mature before becoming methods, essays, or conclusions.

Most public conversations begin after the thinking has settled. The book has been written and the workshop designed. The ideas have become coherent enough to explain.

The Living Inquiry begins earlier.

Each gathering centers on a question that is actively reorganizing my attention. It might emerge from School of the Small and Imperfect, Deep Puppetry, Witnessing Without Colonizing, an organizational collaboration, or simply an ordinary encounter that continues to stay with me long after it ends.

The question hasn't yet become a workshop, an essay, or a conclusion. It's still unfolding.

That's why we meet.

Why join?

Reading finished ideas is different from participating in an inquiry while it's still alive. 

The Living Inquiry is a place to practice that kind of thinking together.

If you've ever sensed that something important was happening in a conversation but couldn't quite name it, if you've found yourself returning to the same questions because existing language doesn't quite fit, this is a place to stay with those questions a little longer.


Why this exists

Over the years, I've come to appreciate that the practices ask something very particular of us.

They ask us to remain with experience before explaining it, to notice before interpreting, and to participate before understanding.

If we stopped every few minutes to unpack the ideas emerging from those practices, we would change the very conditions they are trying to create.

But those questions don't disappear; they continue unfolding (for months, even years) finding their way into my writing, conversations, and the design of future practices.

I wanted a place where those questions could keep developing. Where observations from one practice might quietly reorganize another. Where emerging perceptions could be articulated, tested, and refined before they harden into conclusions.

The conversation isn't a discussion after the work.

It's one of the places the work is made.

The inquiry

The questions rarely begin as theories.

They begin as encounters that refuse to let me go.

  • When does care begin organizing another person's experience?

  • How do social worlds become reproducible through ordinary participation?

  • What capacities make different forms of participation available?

  • What changes when certainty arrives a little later?

  • How do the conditions of a situation shape what becomes thinkable before anyone has consciously decided anything?

Each gathering stays with one question.

Sometimes we simply stay close to the phenomenon itself and see what becomes visible. We might follow its philosophical implications. Or explore what it means for education, leadership, organizing, art, facilitation, or everyday life. The aim isn't agreement or debate.

It's to remain with a question long enough for finer distinctions to emerge.

When different phenomena share the same name, we often respond to them in the same way. When we begin to distinguish between them, new forms of participation become possible.

The language available to us helps shape the participation available to us.

Who joins?

Some people come because they've practiced with me and want to keep following the questions those practices opened. Others have never attended a practice, and they come because these questions have become important in their own lives and work.

You might be an artist exploring different kinds of encounter, an educator questioning what learning asks of relationship, a facilitator interested in participation rather than technique, or a therapist wondering how interpretation shapes experience.

Researchers, organizers, leaders, parents, writers, and others have found themselves returning to the same phenomena because they sense more is happening than existing language can account for.

People don't come because they already agree. They come because they're willing to observe carefully, think rigorously, and let a genuine question reshape how they participate before asking it to become an answer.

The gathering

One question, ninety minutes. No preparation required.

Every gathering begins at the living edge of the inquiry.

If that way of working feels familiar, or feels like something you've been looking for, I hope you'll join us.